Curious Japan, I think part 2

I don't approve of massive widening gap and I voted for DPJ, but what DPJ is doing is a bit extreme. I am not quite satisfied with their some policy which was not written in their manifest, especially about their economic plank. Japan should accept widening disparity to some extent. Widening disparity is an ineluctable trend to some extent. What Japan should see as a problem is "noblesse oblige" we have lost in post war times.



Disparity society in the West doesn't have a bent for Japan. Gap opens the way for social destabilization. But, if we have enough money, we can't extend a helping hand to underdog. Welfare policy in capitalist country needs money. In capitalist country, thanks to competent people earn good money, all people can live.



"Greed" and "to earn much money" are different. However, many opponents equate with both two concepts. Envy forces those opponents to do it and they masquerade as paragon of virtue. I'm a Japanese, and know about their makeup of the mind. It is sure mammonism is immoral but to take a jaundiced view and to pose as virtue personified are immoral too. They sign their own death warrant by dragging down competent people. What will they cause? It is a negative cycle. Equality is virtue but equality caused by envy is not virtue. They must abuse virtue of equality. (I don't say envy is sole cause.)



For example, there are many people who run a number on share holders as mammonist. But according to a research by Nihon Keizai Shimbun, a news paper, their is a tendency that having people tends to fail to invest and moderate people earn good money. Now is the age of Asian countries are developing. Even though there is a tendency of asset-inflated economy in some region, people can get lucky with an investment if they unflappably do it. Just let competent people to earn money. Their benefits strengthens domestic demand and enrich our society. I think those opponents envy competent people because those opponents feel dissatisfied they are not the distributors of the wealth. In addition, ought of company is contribution to society. Not to raise stock prices.



What we should see as a problem is not to earn much money but manner of money making and manner of spending. Namely, we must question rich people's cultural accomplishments. Rich people must develop into a well-educated rich men.



David Rockefeller appeared in morning edition of Nihon Keizai Shimbun. He acquainted a word "Opportunity comes with responsibility". It means "Rockefeller family is under an obligation to contribute to public welfare. " I don't know what they do but it is a nice word.



Until WW2, Japanese wealth people contributed but many nowadays riches are mere upstart. I can reword. Masses has power too much. That Japan failed to foster noble upstart people is one of big failure.



Hayato san will live in Japan hence situation will be better!



Well, I wanted to mention about abuse of virtue by business managers in Japan, citing Bulldog Sauce's case but I have to go to Sushi restaurant to police and to eat! Have a nice day!